Skip to content

Famous security expert: Was this murder?

December 23, 2013

WASHINGTON — Add another national figure to the wide range of people gravely  concerned about the 34-year-old unarmed mother who was gunned down at her car by  U.S. Capitol Police – with her 14-month-old baby in the backseat.
Now it’s Blackwater security-firm founder and former Navy SEAL Erik Prince  asking serious questions about the killing of Miriam Carey on Oct. 3.

The growing list of those doubting the official story from across the  political spectrum suggests a broad sense of concern about the case, which has  gone largely unreported by mainstream media.

While defending the record of his private security company in Iraq, Prince  described to an interviewer on MSNBC how dangerous things happen not just in war  zones, but even in the nation’s capital.

Prince recounted how the dental hygienist from Stamford, Conn., ended up dead  at the hands of Secret Service agents and U.S. Capitol Police officers.

He pointed out, even though Carey had no weapons and no explosives but did  have her infant daughter in her car, “federal police officers opened fire and  killed an unarmed, innocent woman.”

Law enforcement and civil-liberties experts

Those  thoughts echo the sentiments expressed to WND by legal and civil-liberties  experts from across the political spectrum.

Renowned liberal journalist and First Amendment expert Nat Hentoff, a former  board member of the American Civil Liberties Union, told WND he believes police  murdered the young mother.

The famed civil libertarian said from all of the evidence he had seen in  WND’s reports, which he called very thorough and easily corroborated, “[T]his is  a classic case of police out of control and, therefore, guilty of plain  murder.”

Conservative activist and former Graham County, Ariz., Sheriff Richard Mack  told WND, “Miriam Carey should have been arrested, not shot.”

Mack called it “sloppy” police work and saw “no justification whatsoever” for  the use of deadly force against Carey.

Near where Miriam Carey was shot. WND photo by Garth  Kant.

WND asked constitutional law expert John Whitehead, president and founder of  the nonprofit civil-liberties organization the Rutherford Institute: Do you  think Miriam Carey was murdered? While cautioning that he would have to look at  the matter carefully, he answered on the basis of what he has seen so far: “In  my opinion, yes. I think it was what they call a ‘bad shot,’ yes.”

Based on his experience in similar situations, Dan Bongino, a former Secret  Service agent under three presidents including Barack Obama, told WND he  understood the actions of law enforcement officers in a fast-moving and  confusing situation and loathed to evaluate their decisions in hindsight.

But even he felt the situation, involving Secret Service agents at the White  House, could have been handled better and doubted that those involved, or their  superiors, would dispute that.

Saying the incident was absolutely not handled effectively, Bongino predicted  it would lead to changes, including retraining and security modifications.

Still no police report

Almost three months after the shooting, police have still not issued a report  on exactly what happened in the incident that paralyzed Washington for a day.  But legal experts from the left and right have seen enough evidence to call  Carey’s death at the hands of police “murder.”

No one disputes that police pursued the Infiniti driven by Carey, who had her  daughter with her in the backseat, and that when she stopped her vehicle near a  Senate office building, an unknown number of shots rang out – all fired by law  enforcement – and the single mother was killed. Her infant daughter was  uninjured.

The media almost uniformly reported that a mentally unstable and dangerous  woman rammed a gate at the White House, sped away and was eventually shot by  police because she could have posed a security threat to the nation’s  capital.

But the official record and video recordings raise numerous questions about  that account.

Media versus reality

Miriam Carey shooting press conference. WND photo by  Garth Kant.

Mainstream media outlets such as the New York Times, NBC and ABC News all  reported that Carey tried to ram a White House gate or checkpoint.

However, the police report did not mention a White House gate, a barrier or  any attempt to ram anything.

Read the official police affidavit for the Miriam Carey case, Page 1 and Page 2.

The affidavit described the location as “a vehicle checkpoint to the White  House” and said the driver “refused to stop at the vehicle checkpoint and made a  U-turn and began to flee.”

The report did say a Secret Service officer “attempted to block the vehicle  with a bicycle rack, however, the vehicle pushed over the bicycle rack, knocking  the officer to the ground.”

Carey was initially portrayed in the media as a national security threat, but  when that proved not to be true, she was characterized as mentally unstable.

WND interviewed the victim’s sister, Valerie Carey, and her attorney, Eric  Sanders, who are both former New York City police officers.

Valerie Carey, a former police sergeant, took exception to the media’s  description of her sister.

“The media tried to depict my sister as some kind of mentally ill person,”  she said. “For some reason, that makes people think it was sort of OK that she  was shot. She was not mentally ill. She had postpartum depression. If that’s a  reason to kill a person, that’s a very sad lesson.”

Sanders declared, “I don’t care if she suffered from 15 mental conditions!  And, by the way, police are trained to deal with those types of situations, too.  So you can disregard that. We don’t know. The only thing we know is that the  police pulled the trigger.”

The question, he said, is, “Why?”

Sanders has requested the Department of Justice launch a federal  investigation into what happened and how the young mother ended up dead.

Alternatives to death

A WND review of the known facts revealed police may have posed a greater  threat to public safety than Carey did.

It appears she never violated any law until police began pursuing her car.  Officers, on the other hand, fired numerous shots at her in a crowded public  space near the White House, as the video below shows.

“What happened to this woman is an extraordinary example of how police have  no limits when they get into this sort of situation,” maintained Hentoff.

Mack and Whitehead both strongly believe the police should have handled the  car chase much differently, and that they ignored a number of non-lethal  alternatives.

“They’re stacked with them (non-lethal weapons.) Stop the car. She’s a female  with a kid in the car,” Whitehead said. “If it turns out she’s crazy, you can  take her down with a Taser. Or pepper spray. Do it properly.”

Mack said police missed an opportunity when they first had her car  surrounded, which was precisely when they should have blocked her in with their  vehicles.

Indeed, the video shot at the Garfield Monument shows police had that  opportunity. Instead, two, perhaps even three, cruisers parked behind Carey’s  car, rather than boxing her in on the passenger side.

Because officers did not surround Carey then and there, they left her a clear  path to leave the scene. The audio on the video recorded police firing at least  seven shots as she departed.

The former sheriff said firing those shots under those circumstances is  against policy in most police agencies, but, “Regardless, Carey’s action did not  even come close to allowing police shooting at her.”

The fact there was a child in the car further complicated the decision to  shoot. The police report does not say whether officers saw the child in the  car.

But the video shows five of the six officers who surrounded her vehicle on  foot appeared to get an extremely close and clear look inside. It would seem  difficult to believe that at least one of them did not see the toddler in the  car seat.

Mack said they had to have seen that a child was in the car, making the need  for restraint by the police even more necessary. Furthermore, he said the use of  deadly force under those circumstances should have been absolutely  forbidden.

“The police showed utter indifference for the safety of the baby and fired  their guns without provocation,” he concluded. “The decedent (Carey) did violate  some traffic laws, but such does not give police justification for using lethal  force.”

The victim’s sister, Valerie Carey told WND, “As an officer, you have to ask  yourself, ‘What is going on here?’ No one is firing a weapon at you, so why are  you firing?”

CREDIT TO:  Garth Kant / WND.COM

Related articles



Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: