Skip to content

‘Gays’ Admit ENDA game: Outlaw Christian Morality

November 13, 2013

The American public must understand that the tactics used by a combination of groups that work as one, are multi-faceted and are meant to work together toward a single goal. That “goal” is to over turn our Constitution and our Founding Principles. Our Founding Principles are divinely inspired which are instilled in the Constitution itself. By freely allowing others to destroy morality within our nation is not patriotic nor is it Christian. So called Americans who intend to cause harm to another group of Americans, or cause harm to the Founding Principles of the USA or the Constitution itself, ARE NOT FREE TO DO SO! 

Too many times we confuse freewill with the freedom to do anything we want or what groups want. Then one begs to question, why do we have laws?

Our laws are from God, let me clarify that…Not all laws in the US are just or compliant to the Constitution, in fact no law should be unconstitutional not even 0.000000001%! Well you get the idea. Since our laws must be completely and wholly compliant to the US Constitution, and our Constitution is compliant to God’s word, his teachings…then it is clear that morality plays a huge part in the American society. The groups that I spoke of at the beginning, understand, by injecting immoral behavior into our society and gaining acceptance of this behavior. Create the destruction of our entire moral fiber, therefore the destruction of God’s teachings and the Constitution. In the end the destruction of the United States of America!

The Gays now admit their goal is to outlaw Christian morality! If Christian morality bites the dust so does the Constitution and America as I have explained. These people know exactly what they are doing and what’s worse Americans are allowing them to continue their march toward the dismantling of America.

Americans must recognize what these people are doing and put a stop to their agenda. Otherwise say goodbye to America and our God given freedoms. We have no one to blame but ourselves if we allow these people to accomplish their goals. Wise up America and make a stand to return our nation to the Founding Principles which made this nation great! 

Divine Freedom


Photo credit: Philocrites (Creative Commons)

The religious liberty death spiral continues.

One of the most dangerous and discriminatory pieces of legislation in modern  times – the ironically tagged “Employment Non-Discrimination Act,” or ENDA –  passed the U.S. Senate on Thursday by a vote of 64-32. Ten Republicans  disgracefully joined liberal Democrats in this effort to ultimately outlaw the  Judeo-Christian sexual ethic.

According to its leftist proponents, ENDA would merely insulate people who  choose to engage in homosexual conduct (sexual orientation) or those who suffer  from gender confusion (gender identity) against employment intolerance. In  truth, however, this legislation effectively would codify the very thing it  purports to combat: workplace discrimination.

Writing in the Huffington Post, popular homosexual radio  personality Michelangelo Signorile confessed that, of any potential  ENDA legislation that might reach President Obama’s desk for his pledged  signature, “none should include any religious exemptions” whatsoever.

If Signorile and other “LGBT” activists get their way, this would mean that  churches, mosques, synagogues, religious schools, Bible bookstores, and any and  every other business in America with 15 or more employees, would be forced,  under penalty of law, to abandon the biblical and traditional-values viewpoint  on human sexuality and hire (and otherwise not offend) those who openly flaunt  expressly sinful and demonstrably self-destructive sexual behaviors.

Though in its current form ENDA contains an extremely weak religious  exemption that might – and I mean might – partially protect some churches and  religious organizations (until they’re sued by “gay” activists), this so-called  exemption would leave most others – such as the aforementioned Bible bookstores  and many Christian schools and para-church organizations – entirely unprotected.  It would additionally crush individual business owners’ guaranteed First Amendment rights.

Although Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) attempted to amend the bill to strengthen  religious protections, his amendment was shot down 55-43. Unbelievably, he voted  for ENDA anyway.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on the other hand, wasn’t even  considerate enough to feign concern for the First Amendment. He promised  homosexual pressure groups that Democrats would remove all protections for  Christians and other people of faith on the flipside – after ENDA passed.

The homosexual news site Washington Blade reports that homosexual activist Derek Washington of  “GetEqual” confirmed Reid’s promise. In a conference call with homosexual  activists a week earlier, Washington admitted that Reid vowed, as goes any  religious exemption, “the main thing to do was get the vote taken care of, and  then deal with it later. As often times happens, you don’t get something perfect  the first time around, you go back and fix it later, so that was basically his  take on it.”

According to the Blade, “That account was corroborated by Faiz Shakir, a Reid  spokesperson, who said the Democratic leader understands the concerns, but wants  to get the bill passed first, then go back and address the exemptions.”

They’ve stopped pretending, folks. This is about criminalizing  Christianity.

Still, there is a little good news. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has  said that, for now at least, he opposes the law and will block it because it is  both unnecessary and will result in “frivolous lawsuits.” He agrees with  constitutional think tanks like the Heritage Foundation that have conclusively demonstrated the threat ENDA poses to  First Amendment freedoms.

“The speaker believes this legislation will increase frivolous litigation and  cost American jobs, especially small business jobs,” said Boehner spokesman  Michael Steel.

ENDA represents government-sanctioned viewpoint discrimination, plain and  simple. It is no different from forcing a deeply religious business owner to  hire and accommodate an “out and proud” adulterous “swinger.” It directly  alienates the unalienable rights of people of faith. It pits the government  directly against the free exercise of religion and is, therefore,  unconstitutional on its face.

During his second term, President George W. Bush issued a Statement of  Administration Policy on ENDA, highlighting its unconstitutionality: “[ENDA] is  inconsistent with the right to the free exercise of religion as codified by  Congress in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).”

President Obama, however – who never met a Constitution he didn’t violate – has vociferously endorsed  the bill and promises to sign it into law should it pass both houses of  Congress. This is in perfect keeping with his demonstrated belief that the  federal government’s constitutionally limited powers are more of a suggestion  than a requirement.

Chai Feldblum is a lesbian activist and sexual nihilist lawyer who, in the  past, has publicly supported legalized polygamy and bisexual polyamory. She is  Obama’s recess-appointed commissioner to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity  Commission (EEOC). As ENDA’s chief framer, Ms. Feldblum would be charged with  its primary enforcement. This is the classic fox-guarding-the-hen-house  scenario.

In the past, Ms. Feldblum has repeatedly and candidly summed up the mindset  behind the bill. She has publicly stated that the battle between religious  freedom and unfettered sexual license (aka “gay rights”) is a “zero-sum game,”  meaning the two cannot possibly coexist in harmony. It’s a “winner takes all”  approach.

When asked about the Christian business owner or religious organization that  morally objects to hiring people openly engaged in the homosexual lifestyle, Ms.  Feldblum snapped: “Gays win, Christians lose.” And where Americans’  constitutionally guaranteed right to religious liberty comes into conflict with  the postmodern concept of homosexual “rights,” Ms. Feldblum has admitted having  “a hard time coming up with any case in which religious liberty should win.”

Of course, her analysis is entirely arbitrary and completely unsupported by  any reasonable constitutional interpretation or federal precedent. But to Ms.  Feldblum, Comrade Obama, and his kooky cadre of revolutionary advisers, little  things like the U.S. Constitution and federal precedent are but obnoxious speed  bumps on the fast track to a brave new world.

Speaker Boehner, you alone stand between these torch-wielding nutters and a  highly flammable U.S. Constitution.

Please stand your ground, sir. Under Obama, liberty has suffered quite  enough, thank you.

(Note: Republicans voting for ENDA were Sens. Susan Collins, Maine, Mark  Kirk, Ill., Lisa Murkowski, Alaska, Dean Heller, Nev., Kelly Ayotte, N.H., Rob  Portman, Ohio, Jeff Flake, Ariz., John McCain, Ariz., Orrin Hatch, Utah, and Pat  Toomey, Pa.)


 Related articles


One Comment
  1. Daniel Hearing permalink

    “So called Americans who intend to cause harm to another group of Americans, or cause harm to the Founding Principles of the USA or the Constitution itself, ARE NOT FREE TO DO SO! ” But that is EXACTLY what YOU are espousing!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: