Skip to content

Bombshell: Britain Sold Chemicals to Syria to Produce Sarin Gas

September 2, 2013

Here’s a question that deserves an answer. Is it OK to aid the enemy when  your ally is the Al Qaeda linked Syrian Rebels? I think so. As if this story  did not have enough twists already, it seems as though the British sold  chemicals to Assad that could have been used in the production of  sarin gas.

British politicians are very angry and demanding answers of Prime Minister  David Cameron. It’s no wonder Cameron wanted to bomb Assad. He has to get rid of the  evidence. Actually it’s a lot more than that, as I will explain later.

The Daily Record broke the news on Sunday:

BRITAIN allowed firms to sell chemicals to Syria capable of being  used to make nerve gas, the Sunday Mail can reveal today.

Export licences for potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride were granted  months after the bloody civil war in the Middle East began.

The chemical is capable of being used to make weapons such as sarin,  thought to be the nerve gas used in the attack on a rebel-held Damascus suburb  which killed nearly 1500 people, including 426 children, 10 days  ago.

President Bashar Assad’s forces have been blamed for the attack,  leading to calls for an armed response from the West.

Does this mean that Britain aided and abetted their enemy? Sure it does.  Honestly it’s a relief to know that Barack Obama is not the only one  who does that. He and Cameron certainly have a lot to talk about. They should  sit and have a spot of tea.

The Daily Record goes on to state:

The chemical export licences were granted by Business Secretary Vince  Cable’s Department for Business, Innovation and Skills last January – 10 months  after the Syrian uprising began.

They were only revoked six months later, when the European Union imposed  tough sanctions on Assad’s regime.

We know how badly Obama and Cameron want to get into the action in  Syria. This is not necessarily proof, but it does make one wonder.

Was this part of a set up?

Did they want Assad to use chemical weapons so badly that they were  willing to sell them to him?

I don’t think it would surprise many people on this side of the pond if there  was a set up. The only surprise would be if Barack Obama didn’t have his hands  in it too.

I want you to think very hard about something. It was revealed some time ago  that Obama has been secretly aiding the Syrian Rebels since 2012.  Now we see that the British sent the goods to Assad. Between us and our trusted  allies, we are arming both sides.

Does it look to you as if Obama and Cameron wanted this conflict to escalate?

Of course, they did. That way they could rush in to save the day.

This is not about humanitarianism. It is not about punishing Assad. It is not  about choosing to side with good versus evil.

This is what the British and Americans do, no matter who is in  power. They find a situation that can benefit them in some way, and they  exploit  it.

This is exactly why many of these countries hate “The West.”

If we wanted to fight evil forces and support good, we would go wipe  out Boko Haram in Nigeria.

So why don’t we?

Because there’s nothing in it for us.

Syria is a different story. The  Saudis are behind this, and the Saudis have lots of money and oil.

The U.K. and U.S. both like  money and oil. If you want to learn about the Saudi connection, you  can click here.


Credit To: Freedom Outpost


From → Current News

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: